Your message dated Sun, 03 Apr 2016 12:15:25 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#819528: transition: angular.js
has caused the Debian Bug report #819528,
regarding transition: angular.js
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
819528: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819528
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
I don't know if the Release Team follows JavaScript library
transitions or not. But I think it's better to be aware of
angular.js (libjs-angularjs) 1.3 (in Sid) to 1.5 (in experimental)
transition. I have noted the affected package maintainers.
Giving links on the migration issues[1][2]. The packages that may
need update:
glances
grafana-data
node-sprintf-js
nqp
owncloud-music
owncloud-tasks
The owncloud modules may not be relevant as owncloud is going to be
removed from the archive. Reason is that upstream gone hostile[3] and
don't want the software in distributions.
Regards,
Laszlo/GCS
[1] https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/migration#migrating-from-1-3-to-1-
4
[2] https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/migration#migrating-from-1-4-to-1-
5
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816376
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2016-03-30 06:38, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
I don't know if the Release Team follows JavaScript library
transitions or not. But I think it's better to be aware of
angular.js (libjs-angularjs) 1.3 (in Sid) to 1.5 (in experimental)
transition. I have noted the affected package maintainers.
There's not really anything for us to do, this should just be handled
like any other package upgrade with r-deps.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
--- End Message ---
