على الإثنين 11 نيسـان 2016 14:00، كتب Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > On 09/04/16 21:24, Afif Elghraoui wrote: >>> The other option is to fix python-pysam on i386 (i.e. fix >>> bcftools). Obviously the latter would be preferable... >>> >> >> The main problem is #819617, which has been under investigation upstream >> for some time and I doubt that a resolution will appear soon. bcftools >> is a new build-dependency of pysam, so there is no regression on >> python-pysam's part. > > Can you ping the upstream bug again? It seems like upstream was working on it, > and some time has passed, so maybe will see a fix soon. In that case, having > it > build on i386 to solve this uninstallability problem would be good. >
Done. I don't inspire as much urgency for this kind of report since I don't speak as an affected user, but I pinged anyway. > Otherwise, removing the i386 binaries for the rdeps is the way to go. > Okay. I'll see what they say. Thanks and regards Afif -- Afif Elghraoui | عفيف الغراوي http://afif.ghraoui.name
