On 01/06/16 11:27, YunQiang Su wrote: > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 28/05/16 14:31, YunQiang Su wrote: >>> Oh, I need to remove gcc-4.9/gcc-5/gcc-6/gnat-4.9. >> >> Is gcc-snapshot needed? > > It is not needed. Sorry forget to exclude it. > >> >> BTW are these the ones with affected static libraries, or all of them? Per >> your >> email, we should do the packages with static libraries first, and only then >> do >> the rest, IIUC. >> > > These are all about static libraries, aka some static libraries from > them are still not > fpxx-enabled. > >> If that's too cumbersome to find, we can do all now and then rebuild the ones >> that are still using the old ABI because of static linking. Those shouldn't >> be >> too many anyway as we don't use static linking much. > > It is not difficult to detect static libraries.
OK. I have scheduled them all, with a lower priority so other uploads can be built as well. There were some problems though: W: can't get version info for firedns/mips W: can't get version info for firedns/mipsel W: can't get version info for geoclue/mips W: can't get version info for geoclue/mipsel W: can't get version info for libhtp/mips W: can't get version info for libhtp/mipsel Are those the right package names? For geoclue you may have meant geoclue-2. src:geoclue is no longer in unstable/testing. Cheers, Emilio
