Your message dated Sat, 4 Jun 2016 12:07:52 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#822744: transition: gloox
has caused the Debian Bug report #822744,
regarding transition: gloox
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
822744: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822744
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small
transition, with only 3 source packages affected (tested builds against newer
gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):
licq (FTBFS not related to gloox, #820106, pending autoremoval)
0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
Ben file:
(https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gloox.html is accurate)
Regards,
Vincent
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 28/04/16 01:20, Vincent Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:12 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 27/04/16 03:59, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> User: [email protected]
>>> Usertags: transition
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively
>>> small
>>> transition, with only 3 source packages affected (tested builds against
>>> newer
>>> gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):
>>>
>>> licq (FTBFS not related to gloox, #820106, pending autoremoval)
>>> 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
>>> uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
>>
>> Go ahead.
>
> Uploaded, built and installed on all archs. Thanks in advance for
> scheduling binNMUs!
This is now finished.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
