Your message dated Mon, 6 Jun 2016 19:14:45 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#824257: transition: suitesparse4.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #824257,
regarding transition: suitesparse4.5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
824257: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824257
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-suitesparse.html

Dear Release Team,

Please schedule a transition for suitesparse.

Note that with this new release, upstream commits to ABI tracking. Hence the
shorter SONAMEs.

All reverse deps build fine (except two which FTBFS for unrelated reasons:
freefem++/#824256, elmerfem/#754713).

Best,

-- 
 .''`.    Sébastien Villemot
: :' :    Debian Developer
`. `'     http://sebastien.villemot.name
  `-      GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 17/05/16 22:55, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le mardi 17 mai 2016 à 15:54 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 14/05/16 10:33, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
>>>
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: [email protected]
>>> Usertags: transition
>>> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/a
>>> uto-suitesparse.html
>>>
>>> Dear Release Team,
>>>
>>> Please schedule a transition for suitesparse.
>>>
>>> Note that with this new release, upstream commits to ABI tracking.
>>> Hence the
>>> shorter SONAMEs.
>>>
>>> All reverse deps build fine (except two which FTBFS for unrelated
>>> reasons:
>>> freefem++/#824256, elmerfem/#754713).
>> This entangled with glpk, which has just migrated. So you can go
>> ahead.
> 
> Thanks. Uploaded and built on all release arches.

I removed the last two broken rdeps. This is finished now.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to