Your message dated Thu, 4 Aug 2016 18:51:22 +0200
with message-id <34db8f19-6b94-7940-7150-74d60ab8b...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#825282: transition: gnat-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #825282,
regarding transition: gnat-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
825282: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825282
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
The upload of gnat (6) about a month ago started the transition from
gnat-4.9 to gnat-6. This deserves a tracker.
Below is my attempt on a ben file, not sure whether it covers the right
things. I just analyzed some uninstallability discovered by piuparts.
There are packages that
(Build-)Depends: gnat, gnat-4.9, ...
but gnat now Depends: gnat-6 and gnat-6 has Conflicts: gnat-4.9
These probably need sourceful uploads instead of binNMUs.
Ben file:
title = "gnat-6";
is_affected = .depends ~ /gnat-/ | .build-depends ~ /gnat-/;
is_good = .depends ~ "gnat-6" | .build-depends ~ "gnat-6";
is_bad = .depends ~ "gnat-4.9" | .build-depends ~ "gnat-4.9";
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 26/05/16 12:06, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-6.html
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> Cc'ing debian-ada@.
>
> On 25/05/16 15:12, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> The upload of gnat (6) about a month ago started the transition from
>> gnat-4.9 to gnat-6. This deserves a tracker.
>>
>> Below is my attempt on a ben file, not sure whether it covers the right
>> things. I just analyzed some uninstallability discovered by piuparts.
>> There are packages that
>> (Build-)Depends: gnat, gnat-4.9, ...
>> but gnat now Depends: gnat-6 and gnat-6 has Conflicts: gnat-4.9
>> These probably need sourceful uploads instead of binNMUs.
>
> Everything needs a sourceful upload, per the ada policy (as they rename the
> -dev packages).
>
>> title = "gnat-6";
>> is_affected = .depends ~ /gnat-/ | .build-depends ~ /gnat-/;
>> is_good = .depends ~ "gnat-6" | .build-depends ~ "gnat-6";
>> is_bad = .depends ~ "gnat-4.9" | .build-depends ~ "gnat-4.9";
>
> I have added a tracker at
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gnat-6.html
>
> Why not include gnat-5 in is_bad?
>
> @ada people: is this useful to you? Are there any changes I could make to
> make it better?
>
> Hopefully this helps make the transition shorter.
I removed libxmlezout and aged adacontrol. With that and some decrufts, the
transition went in.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
