On 31/08/16 12:00, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 08/31/16 11:30, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 08/31/16 00:41, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 28/08/16 18:13, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>> On 08/25/16 19:17, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>>> On 08/25/16 17:33, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>>>> Several packages unfortunately fail to build, some due to unrelated >>>>>> issues to the new protobuf packages. Bugs still need to be filed for >>>>>> those that weren't sid-ony due to RC bugs already. >>>>> >>>>> The bugreports have been filed, and ones specific to protobuf 3.0.0 >>>>> have >>>>> been usertagged for easy access: >>>>> >>>>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=protobuf-3.0.0;[email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Release Team, can you schedule binNMUs for the packages that rebuilt OK? >>> >>> Scheduled. >> >> Thanks, can you also nmu libphonenumber (7.1.0-4), it builds >> successfully with the changes from protobuf (3.0.0-6). >> >> And mosh (1.2.6-1) which I mistakenly marked as NOT-NEEDED which should >> have been mozc which was already rebuilt via a maintainer upload.
Both scheduled. > Just for the record, osmium rebuilds are failing because most tests segfault > by > having two version of libdap installed. Caused by the uncoordinated transition > triggered with the upload of libdap (3.18.0-1) to unstable. gdal needs to be > rebuilt with the new libdap to fix the issue affecting the osmium package. > First > the libdap build failures on several release architectures need to be fixed. OK. Looks like libdap is already fixed. I'll look at its binnmus later. Cheers, Emilio
