Hi,
On Sat, Oct 8, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 07/10/16 17:15, roucaries bastien wrote: >> I have tried and it seems so. >> >> Due to perl transition I get some transient problem but it seems ok, >> except package only available under unstable > > Alright. This is small enough that should be fine in any case. > > You can go ahead. I need to upgrade a newer version to experimental fixing two CVE... I will prefer to use the newest version and I am rebuilding for experimental. they are now two problems k3b FTBS for unstable #838516 pythonmagick need to be upgraded to newer version It is a good idea to upgrade pythonmagick due to security concern. > > I wonder why you called the new package libmagick++-6.q16-6v6 rather than just > libmagick++-6.q16-6. That seems like a mistake, though I guess just leave it > like that now, no need to go through NEW and add conflicts/replaces etc just > for > a cosmetic change. Because some experimental version get a libmagick++-6.q16-6 then they are an ABI problem due to newer g++ So double bump. Bastien > > Cheers, > Emilio