On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 08:34:05AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2016-10-17 1:03, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >I see we have two different stable update attempts for openbox, both
> >versioned 3.5.2-8+deb8u1:
> >* NMU by Salvatore Bonaccorso fixing #808138
> >* maintainer upload by Mateusz Łukasik fixing #838326 (RFS #841017)
> >
> >I have no opinion about appropriateness of both updates, but as they seem
> >to be independent, combining them is trivial.  Could we have a word from
> >the SRMs as to whether both, or any, of these updates would be acked?
> If you're more patient, sure. The older of the two requests appears to be
> less than a week old.

Yeah, my point is to avoid you having to do a full review just to have the
request amended.  It'd be nice to hear a preliminary response, in case one
of these bugs is going to be rejected.

And there's no hurry, it's not like the next point release is tomorrow...

> >I guess two updates in a single point release would be a bad idea, thus
> >there's a need to coordinate.
> Two updates is fine, but would indeed need co-ordination as one would have
> to build on top of the other.

Ie, no gain over combining them into a single upload.

A MAP07 (Dead Simple) raspberry tincture recipe: 0.5l 95% alcohol, 1kg
raspberries, 0.4kg sugar; put into a big jar for 1 month.  Filter out and
throw away the fruits (can dump them into a cake, etc), let the drink age
at least 3-6 months.

Reply via email to