Control: tags -1 - moreinfo

On 10/22/2016 12:56 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 22:05:01 +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: britney
>>
>> grass (7.0.5-2) is not migrating to testing even though it's a valid
>> candidate.
>>
>> Due to the motif issue (#840394) the grass package and its reverse
>> dependencies (libgdal-grass & qgis) have been removed from the
>> problematic architectures (#840783, #840784 & #840785), but these
>> partial removals have not been performed in testing yet.
>>
> That makes no sense to me.  Removing those packages on most
> architectures because of #840394 seems like the wrong thing to do
> entirely...

I considered it a better option than waiting for motif/libfl-dev to get
fixed, especially since grass was affected by the readline7 transition.

There has so far been no progress in #837658 nor #841203 to get motif
fixed, especially the libfl-dev bug is quite old. And I don't want to
NMU it and become responsible for someone else's package.

Removing grass from the problematic architectures where actual users of
grass are unlikely since almost everyone is using amd64 is the road of
least resistance to not block testing migration of grass. Which britney
unhelpfully hadn't performed despite it being a valid candidate.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1

Reply via email to