Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:27:00 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: nmu: flex_2.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #841203,
regarding nmu: flex_2.6.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
841203: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841203
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal

nmu flex_2.6.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild with default fPIC flag  (cfr: 
#837658)"


please add an additional build dependency on gcc6_6.2.0-7 to be sure it picks up
the flags, thanks!

G.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Gianfranco Costamagna
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
> Severity: normal
> 
> nmu flex_2.6.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild with default fPIC flag  (cfr: 
> #837658)"
> 
> 
> please add an additional build dependency on gcc6_6.2.0-7 to be sure it picks 
> up
> the flags, thanks!
> 
> G.
> 
> 

Scheduled, thanks.

~Niels

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to