On 05/11/16 21:37, Gilles Filippini wrote: > Control: block -1 by 843040 842815 > > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit le 05/11/2016 à 17:29 : >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 04/11/16 14:45, Gilles Filippini wrote: >>> Gilles Filippini a écrit le 02/11/2016 à 19:05 : >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Good news: every hdf5 reverse dependency but 8 is now 'binnmu OK'. The >>>> remainder is: >>>> * shogun FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #809290 >>>> * tessa FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #817690 >>>> * aster FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #837915 >>>> * deal.ii BD uninstallable - not in testing >>>> * odin FTBFS unrelated to hdf5 - not in testing - #835746 >>>> * libsis-jhdf5-java #842815 - Very low popcon - No reverse depends >>>> will need some more time because part of this java wrapper library >>>> is now shipped with the HDF5 source tree >>>> * yorick-hdf5 #842817 - temporary fix uploaded to experimental >>>> * pytables almost done - FTBFS on big endian arches >>>> >>>> IMO the only showstopper is now pytables, which will hopefully resolve >>>> in the coming days. >>> >>> Update: >>> * yorick-hdf5 #842817 - final fix uploaded to experimental >>> * pytables Affected by #843040 - Tested patch pending >>> >>> There isn't any blocker left but libsis-jhdf5-java which has a very low >>> popcon and no reverse dependencies. Can we agree for a transition slot >>> before the freeze? >> >> Yes, this is looking very good, so I'm acking it. But please don't upload >> just >> yet, I'll give you the go in a few days when things are a bit calmer (there >> are >> just too many transitions at the moment). >> >> And please mark any remaining bugs as blocking this one. > > Done, excepted for the 'not in testing' ones. Unless you'd want these > marked as well?
No, this is fine, thanks. Cheers, Emilio
