Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:43:25 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#838693: nmu: libteam_1.12-2~bpo70+1
has caused the Debian Bug report #838693,
regarding nmu: libteam_1.12-2~bpo70+1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
838693: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=838693
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libteam_1.12-2~bpo70+1 . amd64 . wheezy-backports . -m "Rebuild in a clean
wheezy environment."
this was not built in wheezy ...
libteam5 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14) but 2.13-38+deb7u11 is to be installed
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 25/09/16 11:29, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 23/09/16 19:16, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: [email protected]
>> Usertags: binnmu
>>
>> nmu libteam_1.12-2~bpo70+1 . amd64 . wheezy-backports . -m "Rebuild in a
>> clean wheezy environment."
>>
>> this was not built in wheezy ...
>>
>> libteam5 : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14) but 2.13-38+deb7u11 is to be installed
>
> @backports team: can you take a look at this?
I went ahead and scheduled it.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
