Your message dated Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:51:08 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#812573: nmu: libaec_0.3.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #812573,
regarding nmu: libaec_0.3.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
812573: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812573
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Despite successful buildlog [0], libaec binary packages are missing
for arch x32. Please rebuild them.
[0]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libaec&arch=x32&ver=0.3.2-1&stamp=1448449417
nmu libaec_0.3.2-1 . x32 . unstable . -m "rebuild for x32 because missing in
archive"
Thanks,
_g.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing-updates
APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWpdxiAAoJEO/obGx//s+DguIH/2m9xf67xiBpRDD+bdD0Pt2R
K+OJZO/2H3l2WRs9mn+etSR+upIZGEBSjU27sd88J4Aauj2ozVEQcrtJmvqOKV11
YjTX4nrD/DztEdc84JEFWJDXbF5aDoqg4iuO46jdsZI+4bX/CfKcv5uxkM6qxPPd
Ptdzy87OZ7lURQ3IrhmrmaBN/SKcxgxrkJKbOkKebcB0saslOgPXY3E+DorME40+
ZE+KsvaPikN37VgCrpSodXlyQIWNGkcIZYT1mKsGXXsnv9uAI/OepuuiCCfswhdJ
ZqByzOJRPGZcas48G0uHhlgsdoBH6WmRNLG+FbcL4kS8YThGjCwlZWbuMAGeHOQ=
=YJPU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 26/01/16 20:22, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 13:23 +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 09:27:14 +0100 Gilles Filippini <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Despite successful buildlog [0], libaec binary packages are missing
>>> for arch x32. Please rebuild them.
>>>
>>> [0]
>>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libaec&arch=x32&ver=0.3.2-1&stamp=1448449417
>>>
>>> nmu libaec_0.3.2-1 . x32 . unstable . -m "rebuild for x32 because missing
>>> in archive"
>>
>> This is the case for archs ppc64 and sparc64 as well. Then this binnmu
>> request becomes:
>>
>> nmu libaec_0.3.2-1 . ppc64 sparc64 x32 . unstable . -m "rebuild for x32,
>> ppc64, and sparc64 because missing in archive"
>
> Before doing that, we should understand why the packages are missing and
> whether they're likely to simply disappear again if binNMUed.
>
> I mentioned this to Aurelien on IRC, hopefully he'll be able to have a
> look soon.
Somebody schedule binNMUs on various -ports architectures quite a while ago.
Let's close this.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
