Your message dated Thu, 15 Dec 2016 16:36:00 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#848079: nmu: libcrypt-openssl-bignum-perl_0.07-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #848079,
regarding nmu: libcrypt-openssl-bignum-perl_0.07-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
848079: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848079
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
nmu libcrypt-openssl-bignum-perl_0.07-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against
openssl 1.1.0"
This NMU should pickup libssl1.1 instead 1.0.2 which is it currently
linked against. Once this binNMU is done, a give-back on mips64el of
libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl should be done and the package should build
then (it did so on the porterbox).
I have no idea why it worked on !mips64el, it shouldn't :)
Sebastian
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
> Severity: normal
>
> nmu libcrypt-openssl-bignum-perl_0.07-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild
> against openssl 1.1.0"
>
> This NMU should pickup libssl1.1 instead 1.0.2 which is it currently
> linked against. Once this binNMU is done, a give-back on mips64el of
> libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl should be done and the package should build
> then (it did so on the porterbox).
>
> I have no idea why it worked on !mips64el, it shouldn't :)
>
> Sebastian
>
Scheduled (incl. the give-back with a dep-wait), thanks.
~Niels
--- End Message ---
