On 2009-04-05, Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > [A] Ruby libraries must support as many as possible of the Ruby versions > available in Debian. That currently includes Ruby 1.8, Ruby 1.9.0 > (soon 1.9.1), JRuby 1.0, and JRuby 1.1. (Should we drop JRuby 1.0?) > ruby-support --supported lists the versions that should be > supported.
sure. > [B] Ruby libraries must be installed in "vendor" directories, not mixed > with the ruby standard library. For Ruby1.8 and 1.9, that means > using: > ruby1.8 /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.8 > ruby1.9.0 /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.0 > ruby1.9.1 /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.1 > For JRuby, a change is needed to create such a directory. No > "vendor" dir is supported currently. sure. > [C] Ruby library package naming policy. Ruby library packages can > choose between two naming schemes: > [...] as it's already been mentioned in this thread, most other ruby packages seem to be named xxxx-ruby; the principle of least effort would have me favor the naming schema that involves as little renaming as possible, but I will of course gladly bow to the majority's decision, and rename all my packages if necessary. Regards, --Seb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
