On 29/03/10 at 15:50 +0200, Michael Ablassmeier wrote: > hi, > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 03:38:43PM +0200, Laurent Vallar wrote: > > Sinatra 1.0 has been released and packaging is done : nothing more to > > do, trunk is ready... > > I should ask a DD to review SVN libsinatra-ruby but there is a big > > problem : latest versions were numbered 1.0.a then 1.0.b and now the > > release is ... 1.0 ! > > > > What to do in this case ? Ask upstream to fix release number or else > > do something to debian changelog ? > > i think using an epoch here helps: > > http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#s-f-Version
Well, it is better to avoid introducing an epoch if possible (i.e if the problem is only transient), since, once the epoch is introduced, it will always be there. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [email protected] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [email protected] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
