On 10/10/10 at 04:23 +0200, Vincent Carmona wrote: > 2010/10/9 Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>: > > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > >> I think that it would be better to have a separate tool that does the > >> gem2tgz conversion properly. That tool could then be used by gemwatch. > > > > Ok. > > > > Would you say that the conversion done by gemwatch is good enough > > already, or is it missing something?
I'm not too familiar with the conversion done by gemwatch. It would be nice to dump the gem metadata in a yaml file in the root of the tarball, so it can be reused by a tgz->dsc tool. > I think that Lucas means that gemwatch can use a tool (i.e. gem2tgz) > to do the conversion but gemwatch and this tool must be 2 separate > projects. well, very lightweight "projects", then. :-) - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
