Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 05:05:07PM +0100]: > Well, the part of setup.rb that we are interested in is rather small. > And setup.rb has lots of things that we don't need, like hook support, > and support for ancient versions of Ruby. > > Also, there are some things that we surely want to do differently, like > the ability to install in vendor_ruby for libs to be shared between ruby > implementations. > > So it sounds easier to re-implement it, copy/pasting the parts of > setup.rb that we need. (I originally planned to hack setup.rb as you > suggested, but it's quite a big and crufty script.)
Ok, in that case, I think it would be a worthy goal to repackage all of our trivial packages using your tool - So we can possibly even remove libsetup-ruby! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
