Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > On 03/04/11 at 14:24 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí: > > > I think that the only correct Debian way to ensure clean upgrades is to > > > provide transition packages, unfortunately. Of course, we should also > > > ensure that r-deps use the ruby-foo packages, but there are many ruby > > > packages that have no r-deps, or that are often used without r-deps. > > > > > > The good thing is that the transitional packages can go away as soon as > > > wheezy is released... > > > > ok, let's go there then. For what I understood from > > http://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package, using transitional packages > > has the advantage that the old source package is removed automatically. > > Is that correct? > > > > We still need to update the tracking UDD scripts to ignore the > > transitional packages in migrated packages. > > > > I've just updated ruby-mocha adding the transitional packages. I've > > tested the upgrade and it works fine. Can you please upload it? > > Hi, > > Uploaded.
Thanks. :)
> I've reverted your debian/rules hack and used debian/ruby-tests.rb
> instead.
Another way to do that that occurred to me, and that does not duplicate
upstreams' logic abouth which are the test cases to run, is:
ARGV.unshift('test') # skip if upstream default rake target is reasonable
require 'rake'
Rake.application.run
This requires that upstream's Rakefile does not do things like 'require
"rubygems"', though.
--
Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>
http://softwarelivre.org/terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
