Doh, I had too much backlog of this list's mail when I wrote my last mail regarding rmagick :-P If I had seen it were actively worked on...
Vincent Fourmond dijo [Wed, May 11, 2011 at 03:58:01PM +0200]: > >>> But for rmagick, it seems that the hooks only deal with documentation > >>> building. Wouldn't it be simpler to just run those scripts in the > >>> correct order in debian/rules? > >> > >> Of course, it is still possible, but it requires quite a bit of > >> cumbersome patching of the setup scripts, which I'd rather avoid. > > > > Why? You could call the hooks directly. > > No. They won't work, as the hooks are run with a series of > setup.rb-supplied configuration informations. Those need to be supplied, > probably once for each ruby version, and that makes that really painful. Well, right now I'm calling the example scripts as if they were a test suite, and it just works fine - With both Ruby versions and all. Yes, I'm not building documentation, and rmagick's documentation is quite worthy, but it should not be a major step. Greetings, -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
