On 31/05/11 at 17:49 -0700, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Yes, it is upstream fault. There is a lot of stuff there that is a lot > more complicated then needed. > > Actually, the package seems upstream dead:
Note that it's difficult to blame upstream, given that "dead upstream" is very much true in that case, unfortunately: http://www.rubyfrance.org/articles/2008/09/25/disparition-de-guy-decoux/ > Maybe we should switch upstreams and use this code instead, if you (the > DB specialist ;-)) think it's better. +1 - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
