Am Montag, den 20.06.2011 um 7:48 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > On 16/06/11 at 09:11 +0200, Thomas Müller wrote: > > > > > > Am Donnerstag, den 16.06.2011 um 1:55 schrieb Antonio Terceiro: > > > Thomas Müller escreveu isso aí: > > > > here we go - please find ruby-soap4r on mentors: > > > > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-packages?action=details;package=ruby-soap4r > > > > > > > > Please have a closed look and send back all your comments. > > > > > > After I login to mentors.debian.net, it says: > > > > > > Are you the owner? > > > It appears like this package is not owned by you. > > > > > > It seems like you have to "publish" your package or something (I'm not > > > familiar with the mentors.debian.net workflow). Alternatively you can > > > upload the source package somewhere and send a link to the .dsc file. > > > > > > > Sorry for the wrong link - please use that one: > > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=ruby-soap4r > > > > > > Known issues: > > > > - (gem) version 1.0.0: I already got the feedback form the gem author - > > > > he will change the version to 2.0.0 > > > > - missing man pages: I'll write them in the next days > > > > - breaking tests: tests are written using the gem test-unit - already > > > > packaged for ruby1.9? - need to dig into this > > > > > > test/unit is part of ruby1.8, and ruby1.9 has a compatible > > > (but different) implementation, the unit tests should work regardless. > > > > > > > Tests require 'test/unit/testsuite' - what I miss on my sid-chroot. > > Any idea which package is missing? > > > > > > Maybe there is a sponsor available as well? > > > > Is the Debian Ruby Team willing to take the maintainership? > > > > > > Are you willing to maintain it inside the Ruby team? ;-) > > > > > > > What ritual is necessary to join? ;-) > > Hi, > > see http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby (it might not be perfectly > documented, but if you don't figure out, ask questions, and then improve > the doc ;) >
I'm already digging into this ;-) > > Quick review of your package: > > - is there a reason not to package https://rubygems.org/gems/soap4r ? > Ok, it might not work with 1.9, but maybe you could backport the changes > from soap4r-ruby1.9 ? > (Fransesco already replied on this - myself as well on the new thread) > I'm a bit worried that soap4r-ruby1.9 will not be maintained. > > Also, we really want to support both 1.8 and 1.9, not just 1.9. > > $ grep FIXME * > ruby-soap.docs:# FIXME: READMEs found > ruby-soap.examples:# FIXME: sample/ dir found in source. Consider > installing the examples. > Should the examples go into a separate package? > You need transitional packages. see > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyInWheezy and gen-ruby-trans-pkgs > ... still digging ... > > > > - breaking tests: tests are written using the gem test-unit - already > > > > packaged for ruby1.9? - need to dig into this > > > > > > test/unit is part of ruby1.8, and ruby1.9 has a compatible > > > (but different) implementation, the unit tests should work regardless. > > > > > > > Tests require 'test/unit/testsuite' - what I miss on my sid-chroot. > > Any idea which package is missing? > > Apparently ruby 1.9 has a compatible implementation of test/unit, but > it's possible that some special stuff used in 16runnner.rb is not > compatible. The easier solution could be to simply hack 16runner.rb so > that it runs with 1.9. (we don't need all the complexity in this > anyway). > yep THX, Thomas > - Lucas > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
