2011/9/5 Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>: > debian/rules > ------------ > > Is there a good reason to disable the 'require-rubygems' test?
It was my mistake :( I should have patched out those files with require 'rubygems'. Corrected now with a patch and added those tests again. > > debian/control > -------------- > > The short package description must not start with the package name. > > The long description is absolutely useless. It says nothing about the > package. Changed it, see if it is better. > debian/copryight > ---------------- > > Upstream name is ruby_parser, not ruby-parser Corrected. > debian/watch > ------------ > > same as above, s/ruby-parser/ruby_parser/ > > The substitution of the underscore by an hyphen in the upstream name > package is a bug in gem2deb, and I will fix it. You still need to fix > the generated files in this package, though. Fixed it. Thanks Praveen PS: Can you review ruby-cutest also? Lucas said of irc that he is busy with ruby 1.9.3. It was discussed under thread "how to handle hard coded library paths?" -- പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില് You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your rights from them; you give them permission to rule, only so long as they follow the rules: laws and constitution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOo+eVqCs51frGY=kkdhfxxujp5+v7hmi+pm34n+yd5ny0d...@mail.gmail.com
