Hi, Ruby 1.9.3 RC1 was released today.
I've updated the ruby1.9.1 package to that version (in the experimental branch of the git repo). I've also tried to rebuild all packages maintained by pkg-ruby-extras (and using gem2deb) with that version with that version. The vast majority built fine (inc. test suites): the new failures are ruby-builder ruby-ole ruby-rspec-mocks ruby-spreadsheet. So there are three things to decide. 1) should we upload that version to unstable, or to experimental? I'm very much inclined to upload it to unstable, since it seems better than 1.9.2 in many regards. 2) should we make that version the default for wheezy? We don't need to decide that yet, but I think that we should seriously consider that now. (and I'm in favor of doing it). The transition is looking very good according to http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/wheezy/ . 3) if we make 1.9.3 the default, should we drop 1.8 ? I'm also in favor of doing that, to reduce the maintenance cost. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
