Hi, At Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:52:22 -0600, Gunnar Wolf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > In current renaming practice, transitonal package of libnet-irc-ruby and > > ruby-net-irc are same package name. How do I treat it? > > IMO, as this is a completely unrelated piece of software (completely > unrelated to libnet-irc-ruby), it should neither provide it or > conflict with it (unless, of course, there is a namespace clash).
I see. I'll add "Conflict: libnet-irc-ruby". > I say you should, paralelly and independently, just upload > ruby-net-irc, and file a bug on ftp.debian.org requesting the removal > of libnet-irc-ruby. Maybe add a README.Debian explaining they are two > unrelated libraries, and that the new one does not provide the old > one's API nor anything similar. Ok. I try them. Many thanks for your suggestion, and sorry for late response. Best Wishes, --- Youhei SASAKI <[email protected]> <[email protected]> GPG fingerprint: 4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fwe57qr3.wl%[email protected]
