On 08/11/12 at 02:33 +0100, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu: > > > installing default gems: /tmp/r/lib/ruby/gems/2.0.0 (cache, doc, > > > gems, specifications) > > > bigdecimal 1.1.0 > > > io-console 0.3 > > > json 1.7.1 > > > minitest 3.4.0 > > > psych 1.3.4 > > > rake 0.9.2.2 > > > rdoc 3.9.4 > > > test-unit 2.0.0.0 > > > > Addressing that will be interesting ;) > > Maybe we could just drop those bundled gems and depend on our own > > packages. (I don't mean that we should 'cripple' ruby by removing part > > of what is shipped by default -- I just mean that those gems should come > > from the standalone packages rather than the bundled versions) > > We need to be careful to avoid circular dependencies there - those > packages would need to depend on a ruby interpreter, but the ruby 2.0 > interpreter would depend on them.
Mmh, I've never been very clear on whether circular dependencies are actually that bad. In that case they would be pretty limited. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
