On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 03:18:59PM +0530, Praveen A wrote: > > Is it obvious that test-unit gem has > > more priority than bundled gems? (may be this is a stupid questions I'm a > > newbie to ruby). > > Any third-party library has priority over the libraries that come with the > interpreter, because they are installed to directories that come before in > the > $LOAD_PATH than the path for interpreter libraries: > > $ ruby -e 'puts RUBY_VERSION; puts $LOAD_PATH' > 1.9.3 > /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.9.1 > /usr/local/lib/site_ruby/1.9.1/x86_64-linux > /usr/local/lib/site_ruby > /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.1 > /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/1.9.1/x86_64-linux > /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby > /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1 > /usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/x86_64-linux > > Libraries bundled with the interpreter get installed in the last 2 > directories, > which have the lowest priority. You will have to find a way to avoid that or ask the author to fix the problem by switching to minitest because Test::Unit inside of Stdlib (prior to 2.0 which extracted it entirely) you have a cross-breeding of Minitest and Test::Unit, a case in which (if I remember right) does not exist in the gem itself making it so that the #puke method (which belongs to Minitest) does not exist even though it *should* in theory exist. This is an unfortanate case of using a stdlib that is no longer on-top of it's game compared to Gems (by it's own right considering it's stdlib.)
