On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Tollef Fog Heen <[email protected]> wrote:

> ]] Praveen A
>
> > Should we comment out rubygems usage as a fallback option too?
>
> I don't think so, as long as the dependencies of the package pulls the
> library in, the code is never executed.
>

require "rubygems" is a redundant task unless this library is being built
for >1.9.3 and even if people don't consider it expensive (and it's not
expensive in the grand scheme of things) it's just not needed unless you
are on old-ruby.

Reply via email to