Ok, this suits me equally well (although I had to subscribe). Anyway I was thinking (along the way home from work) that we probably should provide only one version of rails in each Debian release (e.g. move our problems to our downstream packages :)).
We have only few downstream packages and it's not worth our time and energy to keep two and more versions of rails just for one or two r-dependencies. Ondrej On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Ondřej, > > I suggest we use [email protected] for discussion instead. > > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 05:57:59PM +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: > > Hi, > > > > what's your opinion on rails(-defaults) pkg? > > > > Should we bump it to 3.2 or just remove it and keep only rails3? > > > > (And what to do when rails-4.0 is out?) > > I think we should use that to indicate which is the official Rails > version that we consider the default (just as ruby-defaults, > gcc-defaults etc). So right now I think we should bump it to 3.2. > > When Rails 4 is out, and if we decide that it should be the default, > then we bump `rails` to depend on the rails 4 components. > > -- > Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]> > -- Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
