If we provide just one version then it doesn't really make sense to provide virtual packages, we can have real packages instead.
O. On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:04 PM, Praveen A <[email protected]> wrote: > 2013/5/24 Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > > what's your opinion on rails(-defaults) pkg? > > > > Should we bump it to 3.2 or just remove it and keep only rails3? > > > > (And what to do when rails-4.0 is out?) > > How about providing ruby-{action,active}* virtual packages? Some of > them already have but some of them don't have (ruby-activemodel). Even > those who have, some of them are only in experimental > (ruby-activeresource). > > -- > പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില് > You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your > rights from them; you give them permission to rule, only so long as > they follow the rules: laws and constitution. > -- Ondřej Surý <[email protected]>
