Since a large majority of ruby libraries use Expat (MIT/X11) as their license, can we add Expat as the template instead of GPL?
2013/5/25 Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]>: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 05:16:13PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 06:44:06PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: >> > [breaking the original thread] >> >> > On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 04:18:10PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: >> > > debian/copyright: >> > > - it is considered good practice to chose for the license of debian/* >> > > files the same license as upstream to ease distribution. >> >> > Does anyone object to adjusting the dh-make-ruby template to say that >> > by default? (see attached patch) >> >> Maybe something more like the attached patch? I would use a standalone >> paragraph, avoiding to repeat the text of the license. The Comment: >> field serves as an indication and could be removed, if wished by the >> maintainer. What do you think? > > Cool. I'll apply your patch instead of mine. :-) > > -- > Antonio Terceiro <[email protected]> -- പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില് You have to keep reminding your government that you don't get your rights from them; you give them permission to rule, only so long as they follow the rules: laws and constitution. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caoo+evqh68_byalxvejm5ju3f0eo79+5593m6ma6atqah1_...@mail.gmail.com
