El Lunes, 21 de octubre de 2013 18:26:05 David Suarez escribió: > Hi Cédric, > > El 21/10/2013 17:28, "Cédric Boutillier" <[email protected]> escribió: > > On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 07:14:49PM +0200, David Suárez wrote: > > > Hi Cédric, > > > > > > > There seems to be some issues about the license. > > > > The disclaimer at the top of debian/copyright and fix_license_patch > > > > mention that the software is under Ruby's license. However, according > > to > > > > > the LICENSE file from upstream (which present in the github repo, but > > > > not in the gem [1]), the license is "Free for any use with your own > > risk!" > > > > > our public domain. The gem metadata say its Public Domain License. > > > > > > > > I would suggest to: > > > > - use github tarball instead of the gem (at least temporarily) to have > > > > > > > > the LICENSE file included > > > > > > > > - fix the copyright file, and fix_license_patch to reflect upstream's > > > > > > > > choice for a license > > > > > > > > 1: https://github.com/apalmblad/ruby-shadow/issues/12 > > > > > > Updated, thanks. > > > > I have a question: > > shouldn't your get-orig-source target create a .orig.tag.gz tarball, > > instead of a .tar.gz? Once generated and moved in the parent directory, > > dpkg-source complains that there is no upstream source > > ../ruby-shadow_2.2.0.orig.tar.{bz2,gz,lzma,xz}. > > > > Cédric > > A typo, my bad. I will change it and reupload again. > > Thanks, > David
Uploaded. Just remove it, (it generates more problems than advantages). Thanks for you patience, David -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1424898.IDRFye5gjQ@sephirot
