Hi, sorry for late response. At Sun, 9 Mar 2014 11:19:57 +0100, Cédric Boutillier <[email protected]> wrote: > - snip- > > I think we should evaluate what is the more expensive in terms of > maintenance costs, between: > - having a ruby-launchy package > - maintaining simple patches to replace launchy by something else in > other packages.
Hmm. > I am not saying that I am against a ruby-launchy package, not at all. And > probably, if we package more libraries using launchy, it will be > unavoidable to package it. I just consider that as of today, it is more > efficient to just replace the use of launchy by xdg-open in the one or two > applications we maintain and may need it. Ok. I follow your opition. I'll try/apply simple patch for jekyll (and next, tDiary). Best Wishes Youhei --- Youhei SASAKI <[email protected]> <[email protected]> GPG fingerprint: 4096/RSA: 66A4 EA70 4FE2 4055 8D6A C2E6 9394 F354 891D 7E07 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/871txtv1p4.wl%[email protected]
