At Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:47:40 +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Maybe use the name ruby-kakasi-ffi for the package (that would be what > gem2deb would propose), and add a Provides: ruby-kakasi, Replaces: > ruby-kakasi (<< some version) in debian/control? (Breaks: is probably > not needed since there will be no file conflict).
It seems proper way. I'll submit the ITP, thank you. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87fvgbx39d.wl%[email protected]
