On 16 June 2015 2:20:24 am IST, "Cédric Boutillier" <bou...@debian.org> wrote: >On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 08:12:03PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: >> Hi, >> I've prepared the packaging of the gem 'rotp' which is a runtime >> dependency in the dependency chain of GitLab. It is lintian-happy. >> Since it requires RSpec 3, I have targeted it for experimental. It >> builds fine in chroot (with RSpec 3 from experimental). Even though >> the gem bundles an executable with it, I've named the package >> ruby-rotp as the executable usage seemed trivial as per upstream >readme. > >I would probably prefer rotp-ruby for the binary name. It has the >advantage of being proposed when tab-completing the command line. >Since rspec3 arrived in unstable, you can now target unstable for your >package (but still indicate in the build-depend line that it needs >ruby-rspec (>= 3~). > >Cheers, > >Cédric
Cedric, Sorry, but I didn't get you. The binary file is still named "rotp" (bin/rotp) . So auto complete should work fine while executing the binary. Or did you mean the binary package and auto completion while doing some apt operations? Like apt-get install rot<TAB> ? -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
