On 18-02-15 09:59:27, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:50:48PM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > Hi Antonio, > > > > On 18-02-11 16:14:14, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:30:01AM +0100, Georg Faerber wrote: > > > > On 17-12-26 20:59:22, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > > > > On 12/26/2017 08:28 PM, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > > > > > 1) provide a working mail adress in the Maintainer field. > > > > > > > > > > > > Right now, most packages have this set: > > > > > > Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers > > > > > > <pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> > > > > > > > > > > > > The only option that I know of is to replace that with > > > > > > debian-ruby@lists.debian.org. Needs an upload of all packages > > > > > > in any case (before 2018-02-01 preferably). > > > > > > > > > > I'd prefer if tracker.debian.org allows creation of teams [1] though > > > > > it is only in discussion stage. I'm worried about the volume of mails, > > > > > but if that is the only option, we may have to go for it. > > > > > > > > Is this still the way to go, i.e. using debian-ruby@ for the Maintainer: > > > > field? > > > > > > It has been announced since then that there are plans to provide > > > continuity to the alioth mailing lists, so for now I would say let's > > > stick to the current maintainer address (i.e. > > > pkg-ruby-extras-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org) > > > > Thanks for the info. Unfortunately, I already changed the Maintainer > > field in the recent uploads of ruby-arel and ruby-gpgme. I would leave > > these as is for now; please ping me once again, if this change should be > > reverted. > > for consistency I think this should be reverted, yes. > > BUT I don't think you need to do a new upload just to change this, > just leave the change staged in git.
Sure, fixed in git.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
