Am Donnerstag, dem 26.05.2022 um 15:57 +0900 schrieb Marc Dequènes (duck): > Quack, > > When I packaged redmine 5.0.0 one package was missing and I created it > (ruby-deckar01-task-list). Now I recently received #1011414 that tells > me it's a duplicate o_O. > And indeed it is, ruby-task-list is packaging the same software. Problem > is `apt search deckar01` returns nothing and task_list is a valid, > although obsolete, gem (https://rubygems.org/gems/task_list before it > was forked by deckar01). > I think in this case this is really misleading and we should not > highjack the original name unless upstream does so. Sometimes forks > become incompatible and the original project resumes and both diverge > and one cannot be used in place of the other.
What about a Provides: ruby-deckar01-task-list ? Regards, Daniel
