debian-s390  

Messages by Date

• 2024/04/15 Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x Andrius Merkys
• 2024/04/15 Re: Emboss not migrating due to autopkgtest error on s390x Steven Robbins
• 2024/04/06 Bug#1068509: liferea: autopkgtest on s390x suggests liferea is partially broken there Paul Gevers
• 2024/04/03 Re: Bug#1057050 closed by Debian FTP Masters <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> (reply to Patrick Franz <delta...@debian.org>) (Bug#1057050: fixed in qt6-multimedia 6.6.1-1) John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2024/03/31 Bug#1068119: s390-tools: FTBFS: ../../include/boot/s390.h:418:17: error: array subscript 0 is outside array bounds of ‘void[0]’ [-Werror=array-bounds=] Sebastian Ramacher
• 2024/03/23 bug 1064423: src:gnome-keyring: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
• 2024/03/16 Bug#1067026: graphviz: please build without librsvg except on rust platforms Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/14 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Helge Deller
• 2024/03/13 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/13 Bug#1066832: fsverity-utils: hard Build-Depends on unportable package pandoc Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/11 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/11 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Jérémy Lal
• 2024/03/11 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/03/11 Re: python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Jérémy Lal
• 2024/03/11 python-cryptography vs. stainless steel ports Thorsten Glaser
• 2024/02/23 Bug#1064548: tracker-miners: bmp-basic-1 test fails on big-endian Jeremy Bícha
• 2024/02/10 Bug#1063647: sysconfig: missing required debian/rules targets build-arch and/or build-indep Guillem Jover
• 2024/01/15 Re: Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes Simon McVittie
• 2024/01/13 Re: Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes Simon McVittie
• 2024/01/13 Re: Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes Simon McVittie
• 2024/01/13 Bug#1060735: glib2.0/experimental: FTBFS on s390x and other 64-bit BE: gdatetime test fails or crashes Simon McVittie
• 2023/12/31 s390x qemu support in autopkgtest? Paul Gevers
• 2023/12/15 Bug#1058740: gtk4,librsvg: big-endian support is at risk of being removed Simon McVittie
• 2023/12/08 Bug#1057782: gtk4: FTBFS on big-endian: memorytexture test fails Simon McVittie
• 2023/12/02 Re: help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el Rene Engelhard
• 2023/12/01 Bug#1057203: r-bioc-rhdf5filters: missing build-dependency on big-endian architectures Graham Inggs
• 2023/10/29 help needed with LibreOffice Java bridge on s390x/ppc64el Rene Engelhard
• 2023/10/13 Processed: tagging 1007049, tagging 1007084, tagging 1007061, tagging 1007085, tagging 1007086, tagging 1007081 ... Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2023/10/10 Re: Bug#1053767: chromium: please to add support for s390x or armel John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2023/09/30 Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022 Simon McVittie
• 2023/08/28 gcc-13 regression Sebastiaan Couwenberg
• 2023/08/27 Re: Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie Guillem Jover
• 2023/08/22 Bug#1050220: mutter: autopkgtest regression on s390x: tests time out after 5 minutes Simon McVittie
• 2023/08/06 Enabling -fstack-clash-protection for trixie Moritz Mühlenhoff
• 2023/07/30 Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022 Simon McVittie
• 2023/07/28 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Jeffrey Walton
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Andreas Schwab
• 2023/07/22 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/07/21 Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Theodore Ts'o
• 2023/07/21 Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Finn Thain
• 2023/07/20 Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Matthew Wilcox
• 2023/07/20 Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Finn Thain
• 2023/07/20 Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Linus Torvalds
• 2023/07/20 Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Matthew Wilcox
• 2023/07/20 Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Dave Chinner
• 2023/07/20 Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Jeffrey Walton
• 2023/07/20 Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Jeff Layton
• 2023/07/20 Re: [syzbot] [hfs?] WARNING in hfs_write_inode Matthew Wilcox
• 2023/07/09 Re: Adduser/logger problems in s390x autopkgtest Paul Wise
• 2023/07/09 Adduser/logger problems in s390x autopkgtest Marc Haber
• 2023/07/04 Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures) Laurent Siksous
• 2023/07/04 Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures) Adrian Bunk
• 2023/07/03 Re: LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures) Rene Engelhard
• 2023/07/03 LibreOffice bridges/smoketest on mips(64)el (was: Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures) Rene Engelhard
• 2023/06/25 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/06/21 Bug#1038827: libwebm: Failed tests in big-endian architectures Boyuan Yang
• 2023/06/20 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Paul Wise
• 2023/06/20 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Kurt Roeckx
• 2023/06/20 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/06/20 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Kurt Roeckx
• 2023/06/20 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Kirsten Bromilow
• 2023/06/20 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Adrian Bunk
• 2023/06/19 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Jeffrey Walton
• 2023/06/19 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/06/19 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/06/19 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Adrian Bunk
• 2023/06/19 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Jeffrey Walton
• 2023/06/19 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Adrian Bunk
• 2023/06/19 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Jan Engelhardt
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rob Landley
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Kurt Roeckx
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rob Landley
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rob Landley
• 2023/06/18 Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2023/06/18 Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022 Simon McVittie
• 2023/06/18 Re: Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022 Simon McVittie
• 2023/06/18 Bug#1038447: librsvg: FTBFS on big-endian architectures: multiple test regressions since September 2022 Simon McVittie
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Omer Turpault
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Steve McIntyre
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/06/18 Re: unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2023/06/18 unbreaking LibreOffices tests on at least release architectures Rene Engelhard
• 2023/05/09 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Dipak Zope
• 2023/04/19 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Paul Gevers
• 2023/04/18 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Elizabeth K. Joseph
• 2023/03/14 Re: Help needed with tomopy/s390x Dipak Zope1
• 2023/03/14 Help needed with tomopy/s390x Roland Mas
• 2023/02/28 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Paul Gevers
• 2023/02/27 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net James Addison
• 2023/02/24 RE: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout))) Dipak Zope1
• 2023/02/21 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Paul Gevers
• 2023/02/21 RE: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Dipak Zope1
• 2023/02/20 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Philipp Kern
• 2023/02/18 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Philipp Kern
• 2023/02/18 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net James Addison
• 2023/02/17 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Antonio Terceiro
• 2023/02/17 Patch "[PATCH v2 1/1] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal" has been added to the 5.10-stable tree gregkh
• 2023/02/17 Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal Greg KH
• 2023/02/16 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Paul Gevers
• 2023/02/15 [PATCH v3] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal Sumanth Korikkar
• 2023/02/15 [PATCH v2 1/1] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal Sumanth Korikkar
• 2023/02/15 Re: [PATCH 0/1] s390: fix endless loop in do_signal Greg KH
• 2023/02/15 Re: [PATCH 0/1] s390: fix endless loop in do_signal Heiko Carstens
• 2023/02/15 Re: [PATCH 0/1] s390: fix endless loop in do_signal Greg KH
• 2023/02/15 Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal Greg KH
• 2023/02/15 [PATCH 0/1] s390: fix endless loop in do_signal Sumanth Korikkar
• 2023/02/15 [PATCH 1/1] s390/signal: fix endless loop in do_signal Sumanth Korikkar
• 2023/02/14 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Paul Gevers
• 2023/02/13 RE: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout))) Dipak Zope1
• 2023/02/13 RE: suspecting 5.10.0-21 kernel breaking something with futexes on s390x Dipak Zope1
• 2023/02/13 RE: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Dipak Zope1
• 2023/02/12 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Philipp Kern
• 2023/02/12 RE: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Dipak Zope1
• 2023/02/12 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Paul Gevers
• 2023/02/12 Re: help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Philipp Kern
• 2023/02/11 Re: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout))) Otto Kekäläinen
• 2023/02/11 help needed to manage s390x host for ci.debian.net Paul Gevers
• 2023/02/10 Bug#1031022: Does not work on big endian machines Enrico Zini
• 2023/02/08 Re: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout))) Andrew Hutchings
• 2023/02/07 Re: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout))) Sebastian Ramacher
• 2023/02/07 Re: Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (Bug#1030510: Info received (mariadb: FTBFS on s390x: timeout))) Otto Kekäläinen
• 2023/02/06 Re: suspecting 5.10.0-21 kernel breaking something with futexes on s390x Dipak Zope1
• 2023/02/06 Re: suspecting 5.10.0-21 kernel breaking something with futexes on s390x Dipak Zope1
• 2023/02/06 suspecting 5.10.0-21 kernel breaking something with futexes on s390x Michael Tokarev
• 2023/01/11 libyang2 broken on big endian architectures Marco d'Itri
• 2023/01/10 LibreOffice architecture support (was: Fwd: Plan to remove dead C++ UNO bridge implementations (bridges/source/cpp_uno/*)) Rene Engelhard
• 2023/01/10 Is jpeg-xl blacklisted from s390x ? Mathieu Malaterre
• 2022/12/30 Re: Differences between the zani and zandonai build hosts? Kurt Roeckx
• 2022/12/30 Re: Differences between the zani and zandonai build hosts? Peter Pentchev
• 2022/12/29 Differences between the zani and zandonai build hosts? Peter Pentchev
• 2022/12/06 Bug#1025532: ostree: often FTBFS on s390x: tests/test-sysroot.js:96: deploymentPath.query_exists(null) should be false Simon McVittie
• 2022/11/20 Bug#1024515: mariadb-10.6: FTBFS on s390x: test main.order_by_innodb failed with type 'ref' Otto Kekäläinen
• 2022/11/18 Bug#1024391: gtk4: FTBFS on big-endian: some dependency made border-image-excess-size reftest regress Simon McVittie
• 2022/09/28 Re: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Michael Biebl
• 2022/09/23 Re: RE: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
• 2022/09/07 Re: Bug#1018224: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
• 2022/09/07 Re: Bug#1018224: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Michael Biebl
• 2022/09/07 RE: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Dipak Zope1
• 2022/09/02 Bug#1018939: zarr: autopkgtest regression on s390x Graham Inggs
• 2022/08/30 RE: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Dipak Zope1
• 2022/08/29 Re: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
• 2022/08/29 Re: src:exempi: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Michael Biebl
• 2022/08/15 Re: Bug#1016937: atop: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and armhf and times out on s390x Marc Haber
• 2022/08/13 Re: Bug#1016937: atop: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and armhf and times out on s390x Paul Gevers
• 2022/08/12 Re: Bug#1016937: atop: autopkgtest regression on arm64 and armhf and times out on s390x Paul Gevers
• 2022/08/12 investigating unreproducible autopkgtest failure of atop on s390s Marc Haber
• 2022/07/12 help about build fail on s390 for rush package Bo YU
• 2022/07/01 Re: enabling link time optimizations in package builds Timo Röhling
• 2022/07/01 libunwind: please update to new upstream (moved to github) Graham Inggs
• 2022/06/29 Bug#1014061: FTBFS on s390x: test suite failure when dumping a gif file Michael Biebl
• 2022/06/17 enabling link time optimizations in package builds Matthias Klose
• 2022/06/02 Re: src:vkd3d: fails to migrate to testing for too long: FTBFS on s390x Paul Gevers
• 2022/05/28 Bug#1011978: kakoune FTBFS on big endian Adrian Bunk
• 2022/05/26 sysconfig is marked for autoremoval from testing Debian testing autoremoval watch
• 2022/05/26 s390-tools is marked for autoremoval from testing Debian testing autoremoval watch
• 2022/05/25 Bug#1011625: mercurial: autopkgtest regression on s390x Graham Inggs
• 2022/05/12 Re: needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
• 2022/05/11 needs suggestion on LuaJit's IBM architecture dilemma M. Zhou
• 2022/04/25 RE: Bug#1004870: python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on s390x Rajendra Kharat1
• 2022/04/18 Re: qt6-declarative fails to build on s390x Patrick Franz
• 2022/04/18 Re: qt6-declarative fails to build on s390x Paul Gevers
• 2022/04/18 qt6-declarative fails to build on s390x Paul Gevers
• 2022/04/17 Bug#1009772: armci-mpi: autopkgtest regression on s390x Graham Inggs
• 2022/04/08 Bug#1009185: csound: autopkgtest regression on s390x Graham Inggs
• 2022/03/23 Re: Bug#1004870: python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on s390x Graham Inggs
• 2022/03/23 Bug#1008171: python-confluent-kafka: FTBFS on big-endian Graham Inggs
• 2022/03/10 Bug#1007056: sysconfig: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format Lucas Nussbaum
• 2022/03/06 RE: Bug#1004870: python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on s390x Rajendra Kharat1
• 2022/02/16 Re: Bug#1004870: python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on s390x Graham Inggs
• 2022/02/02 Bug#1004870: python-xarray: autopkgtest regression on s390x Graham Inggs
• 2022/01/20 Bug#1004103: calcurse FTBFS on big endian Adrian Bunk
• 2022/01/20 Bug#1004077: node-pbkdf2: autopkgtest regression on s390x Graham Inggs
• 2022/01/13 Re: Porter roll call for Debian Bookworm YunQiang Su
• 2022/01/13 Re: Porter roll call for Debian Bookworm Sandro Tosi
• 2022/01/04 Re: Porter roll call for Debian Bookworm PICCA Frederic-emmanuel
• 2021/12/30 Re: Porter roll call for Debian Bookworm Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
• 2021/12/29 Re: Porter roll call for Debian Bookworm Rajendra Kharat1
• 2021/12/28 Fw: Re: Porter roll call for Debian Bookworm Dipak Zope1
• 2021/12/26 Re: Porter roll call for Debian Bookworm YunQiang Su
• 2021/12/26 Re: Porter roll call for Debian Bookworm Vagrant Cascadian

• Earlier messages