On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two >>> proposals: >>> - have an inplace-transition building required library packages for an >>> upgrade as biarch packages and continue to use the current sparc name. >> This would mean that many packages needs to be modified. Is it really >> worth the work needed if we consider the availability of multiarch in >> the next time? > you'll end up modifying a different set of packages for the new > architecture name in control and rules files. I don't know if this is > less or more work.
If I understand this correctly, this would need the modification off all library packages to implement biarch semantic. Bastian -- Star Trek Lives! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
