On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:55:24PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 19.08.2009 13:42, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 01:16:36PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>> I did speak with Martin Zobel at Debconf on how to get there, having two 
>>> proposals:
>>>   - have an inplace-transition building required library packages for an
>>>     upgrade as biarch packages and continue to use the current sparc name.
>> This would mean that many packages needs to be modified. Is it really
>> worth the work needed if we consider the availability of multiarch in
>> the next time?
> you'll end up modifying a different set of packages for the new 
> architecture name in control and rules files. I don't know if this is 
> less or more work.

If I understand this correctly, this would need the modification off all
library packages to implement biarch semantic.


Star Trek Lives!

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-s390-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to