On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:51:36AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > During the build, this is what happens: > INFO | negative control allocated at 0x40028000 > INFO | positive control allocated at 0x4002a000 > INFO | poison area assumed at 0xf0dea000 (preferred addr) > TEST-PASS | reading negative control > TEST-PASS | executing negative control > TEST-PASS | writing negative control > TEST-PASS | reading positive control | Segmentation fault > TEST-PASS | executing positive control | Segmentation fault > TEST-PASS | writing positive control | Segmentation fault > TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | reading poison area > TEST-PASS | executing poison area | Illegal instruction > TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | writing poison area > > It's interesting to see the addresses used for negative and positive > control are significantly different, while running the program on > zelenka and zandonai by hand give an address in 0x77xxxxxx. > > Could that be related to personality ?
schroot should yield the same personality as for the buildd, given that the same chroot definition is used. Kind regards, Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
