On August 4, 2019 7:26:31 PM UTC, Jochen Sprickerhof <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi Scott, > >* Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> [2019-08-04 01:52]: >>I took a brief look at python3 support in ros, and as far as I can >tell, it >>appears to be python3 ready, it just needs someone to change it over. > >That's actually still to be tested. I added python3- packages during >the >last release cycle and did some initial testing, but upstream still >declares it as an open task: > >https://discourse.ros.org/t/planning-future-ros-1-distribution-s/6538 >https://github.com/ros/rosdistro/issues/21513 >https://github.com/ros-infrastructure/rep/pull/149 > >> Since >>it seems like there are multiple packages involved, I would appreciate >it if >>someone in debian-science would have a look and see about changing it >over. I >>started with python-rviz and got confused from there. > >Currently I go through all ROS packages to update them to the newest >versions (that piled up during the buster freeze) and I found some with > >Python 3 updates already. My plan is to setup a test environment with >Python 3 only builds of all packages next and to test them, but I can't > >promise any dates, currently. Would be great if you (or anyone else) >could help with that. I would be happy to help with it. > >What did you confuse in python-rviz? Would be happy to make the >ROS Debian world more transparent.
When I started looking at python-rviz reverse-depends and it wasn't clear what would need to be updated. Scott K -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
