Hi Lumin, Le lundi 28 octobre 2019 à 06:50 -0700, Mo Zhou a écrit : > Package: libatlas3-base > Version: 3.10.3-8 > Severity: normal
> I propose to remove the libcblas.so in order to avoid trapping > more maintainer into the performance problem. > > See the MBF bug: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2019/10/msg00273.html > > > If you agree with that, I'll continue with the MBF. Those > filed bugs would be the blockers for this bug. I have no objection per se to removing this library, but it may introduce problems. Essentially the thing is that some packages (I don't remember which) have a hard dependency on ATLAS, and in that case they don't use our libblas.so, but rather they use libatlas.so + libcblas.so. And since CBLAS is not included in libatlas (IIRC), they really need libcblas.so. So I think the first step is to verify whether such packages are really in that situation, and then to make a decision. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
