+----------------------+ | REJECT reasoning | +----------------------+
Looks like there is code from https://stackoverflow.com/a/46204790/11767360 spread throughout a number of different files, which is under a license which requires attribution in d/copyright. onnx/common/array_ref.h has different copyright holders and license. +----------------------+ | Other comments | +----------------------+ May I ask why the shlib packages are currently commented out in d/control? It might be worth including them in order to avoid another trip through NEW in the near future, if you have time. Please confirm that onnx\onnx-operators.proto and other *.proto can be regenerated using tools included in this package (or another in the archive). Does all the test data really need to be installed into the binary package? +----------------------+ | N.B. | +----------------------+ This review may not be exhaustive. Please check your source package against your d/copyright and the ftpmaster REJECT-FAQ, throughly, before uploading to NEW again. Thank you for your time and contribution! Sean === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
