Your message dated Wed, 5 Jan 2022 17:49:51 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: [src:slepc] any chance to backport more current version to
wheezy-backports?
has caused the Debian Bug report #754390,
regarding [src:slepc] any chance to backport more current version to
wheezy-backports?
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
754390: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754390
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: src:slepc
Severity: wishlist
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
would it take a lot of work to backport a current version of slepc and its
direct dependencies, i.e. petsc, to wheezy-backports? I need a
functionality which is not present in the version in wheezy, but is included
in the one in sid, but I would rather avoid cluttering my wheezy systems
with hand-compiled versions of libraries which are already installed as
packages. I would be willing to help in the backport, if help is needed.
Thanks in advance, bye
Giacomo Mulas
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.14.10-jak
Debian Release: jessie/sid
500 all liveusb.info
401 unstable www.deb-multimedia.org
401 unstable ftp.debian.org
401 unstable download.jitsi.org
399 stable dl.google.com
399 stable deb.opera.com
10 experimental ftp.debian.org
10 experimental cdn.debian.net
--- Package information. ---
Package's Depends field is empty.
Package's Recommends field is empty.
Package's Suggests field is empty.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 16:42:05 +0200 (CEST) Giacomo Mulas
<[email protected]> wrote:
would it take a lot of work to backport a current version of slepc and its
direct dependencies, i.e. petsc, to wheezy-backports? I need a
Support for wheezy (LTS) has ended in 2018 ... wheezy-backports was
probably closed when regular wheezy support ended in 2016.
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
