Your message dated Mon, 28 Nov 2022 07:20:06 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Bug#1000332: fixed in openblas 0.3.21+ds-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000332,
regarding libopenblas64-openmp-dev: CMAKE cannot find OpenBLAS's files
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
1000332: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000332
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libopenblas64-openmp-dev
Version: 0.3.13+ds-3
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?

I try to use OpenBLAS in various open software developments which are based on 
cmake builds

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?

The CMAKE files from OpenBLAS are installed in deep locations that cmake 3.18 
does not
explore. This means that OpenBLAS cannot be used from CMAKE projects. A sample 
project

cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.14)
project(test)
find_package(OpenBLAS REQUIRED)
add_library(test "foo.c")
target_link_libraries(test PUBLIC OpenBLAS::BLAS)

will fail at configuration time (cmake -B ./build -S . -G "Unix Makefiles" 
--debug-find)

   * What was the outcome of this action?

CMAKE fails to find OpenBLASConfig.cmake If invoked with --debug find, cmake 
will
show that it searchers for the cmake files in shallower locations

    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/OpenBLASConfig.cmake
    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/openblas-config.cmake
    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas64-openmp/OpenBLASConfig.cmake
    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas64-openmp/openblas-config.cmake
    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/cmake/OpenBLASConfig.cmake
    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas-pthread/cmake/openblas-config.cmake
    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas64-openmp/cmake/OpenBLASConfig.cmake
    /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/openblas64-openmp/cmake/openblas-config.cmake

   * What outcome did you expect instead?

The OpenBLAS files should have been located in those directories for them to be 
located.
Alternatively, Debian Bullseye should have shipped with a more recent version 
of CMAKE
that searchers for OpenBLASConfig.cmake in deeper locations.

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.1
  APT prefers oldstable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.10.60.1-microsoft-standard-WSL2 (SMP w/32 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: unable to detect

Versions of packages libopenblas64-openmp-dev depends on:
ii  libopenblas64-0-openmp  0.3.13+ds-3

libopenblas64-openmp-dev recommends no packages.

libopenblas64-openmp-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: openblas
Source-Version: 0.3.21+ds-3
Done: Sébastien Villemot <[email protected]>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
openblas, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [email protected],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sébastien Villemot <[email protected]> (supplier of updated openblas package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [email protected])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 21:22:10 +0100
Source: openblas
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.21+ds-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Team 
<[email protected]>
Changed-By: Sébastien Villemot <[email protected]>
Closes: 1000332 1022950
Changes:
 openblas (0.3.21+ds-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Install CMake files under /usr/lib/$(MULTIARCH)/cmake/openblas$(FLAVOR)/
     Thanks to Juan Jose Garcia Ripoll for reporting (Closes: #1000332)
   * no-embedded-lapack.patch: fix logic for detecting build with 64-bit
     indexing. In particular, this fixes the riscv64 packages whose embedded
     LAPACK routines were unusable with 32-bit indexing.
     Thanks to Дмитрий Ермилов (Closes: #1022950)
Checksums-Sha1:
 5fe7c072c263d167cfdd1919e60b13d6a9564fd7 4815 openblas_0.3.21+ds-3.dsc
 e261be2bf4d0be3f862d7abcfc8e2e598e5a9a45 24708 
openblas_0.3.21+ds-3.debian.tar.xz
 4f1ac465b45726932f890ef48856eecff911337c 7099 
openblas_0.3.21+ds-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 c89ac48cd993f54f644fba647fc37524167b92d244bae7f74c2dcddf16063cbb 4815 
openblas_0.3.21+ds-3.dsc
 8487176c507c2c613860fc74de6deaef8f5d76ba8734631fbcb38c79d5b9ba26 24708 
openblas_0.3.21+ds-3.debian.tar.xz
 9933c8fa2552b7f93a1ca07a29e1b56f5fad91715529b749b020523b23513639 7099 
openblas_0.3.21+ds-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 d73da14010815d53e07aa6af995fa97b 4815 devel optional openblas_0.3.21+ds-3.dsc
 1a71d4f9facca83fd2a5542a397e2fbc 24708 devel optional 
openblas_0.3.21+ds-3.debian.tar.xz
 05b32a999cdf80080fafd6cf85aec5b1 7099 devel optional 
openblas_0.3.21+ds-3_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Rsh2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
-- 
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Reply via email to