Am 05.01.25 um 13:39 schrieb Antonio Valentino:
Dear Bastian,
I see that you have reverted the change that I did to remove mops32el from the
list of architectures for c-blosc2 [1].
I understand that you claim is that now c-blosc2 pass all tests also on mips64el but I see that c-blosc2 2.15.2+ds-5
still fails on that platform [2].
I requested access to eberlin.debian.org but, unfortunately, I was not able to reproduce the issue. Never the less
sbuilts still seem to fail.
Please not that in that, before toy last change, I opened a but to request the
removal of libblosc2* form mips64el.
I would appreciate any support for solving the issue.
Could you please provide more details about why you concluded that the build is
not successful?
I have built on eberlin.debian.org successfully before uploading the new version. Just retried and the tests still
succeed without segfaults. That is odd.
In general, in such situations it is advisable to keep arch=any. You can still
ask for RMs for a specific architecture.
A package might be buildable later if someone provides a patch, a dependency is fixed or a new version has some upstream
fix. Also, the debports are still being built wih arch=any. So please do not reapply the arch list. FTP Masters will
remove the pkg on mips64el regardless and then it can migrate.
Are you in the position of investigating the issue on mips64el?
I will see what I can do. Just as a hint: You can sbuild with a mips64el qemu
backend.
[1]
https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/c-blosc2/-/commit/6f08edd496176ba49a17cdc9651210dd2d6e562e
[2]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=c-blosc2&arch=mips64el&ver=2.15.2%2Bds-5&stamp=1735998393&raw=0
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1091836
kind regards
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
