Thanks for your diligence in preparing this update and addressing the previous rejection points. While the Bessel_I.C copyright and the Kokkos framework license documentation have been partially updated, a few issues and discrepancies remain.
First, although the files under packages/kokkos/ have been updated, the copyright and license fields for the Kokkos kernels package under packages/kokkos-kernels/ remain undocumented in debian/copyright. This directory is still marked as Apache-2.0 and lists only NTESS as the copyright holder. The headers in these files (such as packages/kokkos-kernels/benchmarks/Benchmark_Utils.hpp) indicate they are licensed under Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception and copyrighted by "Contributors to the Kokkos project", similar to the main Kokkos package. Second, the copyright entry added for packages/pamgen/rtcompiler/ Bessel_I.C has a slight typo: "1985, 1987, Stephen by Stephen L. Moshier". In addition to the "Stephen by Stephen" duplication, it misses the years 1984 and 2000 which are explicitly present in the copyright headers within the file (specifically "Copyright 1984, 1987, 2000 by Stephen L. Moshier" at line 169, and "Copyright 1985, 1987, 2000 by Stephen L. Moshier" at line 280). Lastly, there are a few copyright notices in the source that have been normalized in debian/copyright instead of being mirrored verbatim. For example, packages/panzer/mini-em/src/eqn_sets/ MiniEM_AuxiliaryEquationSet_MACROS.hpp lists "Copyright (c) 2015, Sandia National Laboratories" in the source header, but is documented under the NTESS entity name in debian/copyright. Similarly, packages/percept/src/percept/math/DenseMatrix.hpp lists "Copyright 2006 Sandia National Laboratories" and mentions the University of Wisconsin--Madison, but the copyright block in debian/copyright only references NTESS and Jason Kraftcheck's email. Additionally, I've checked the LPPL identifier in fancyhdr.sty. Since the files allow version 1 or any later version, they can be distributed under LPPL 1.3c (or later), which is DFSG-free, so the license definition in debian/copyright is compliant. -rt Further information may be found at: https://dfsg-new-queue.debian.org/reviews/trilinos Regards, Reinhard Tartler Member of the DFSG, Licensing & New Packages Team === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our concerns.
pgpNChtv4NKvU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
