Your message dated Sun, 07 Dec 2014 11:51:46 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line gap-scscp: bashism in /bin/sh script : CLOSE: zealous
checkbashisms
has caused the Debian Bug report #772245,
regarding gap-scscp: bashism in /bin/sh script
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
772245: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=772245
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gap-scscp
Severity: important
Version: 2.1.4+ds-1
User: [email protected]
Usertags: goal-dash
Hi,
I've ran checkbashisms (from the 'devscripts' package) over the whole
archive and I found that your package has a /bin/sh script that uses a
"bashism".
checkbashisms' output:
> possible bashism in ./etc/init.d/gapd line 115 (sleep only takes one
> integer):
> sleep 0.5
> possible bashism in ./etc/init.d/gapd line 136 (sleep only takes one
> integer):
> sleep 0.25
Not using bash (or a Debian Policy compliant shell interpreter that doesn't
provide such an extra feature) as /bin/sh is likely to lead to errors or
unexpected behaviours. Please be aware that dash is the default /bin/sh.
Please closely examine the above output and the script, and determine
what the proper severity of the bug is, and adjust it accordingly. If
it's important or greater please hurry to get this fixed for jessie.
Hints about how to fix bashisms can be found at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DashAsBinSh
Thanks in advance,
Raphael Geissert
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I close the bug because it sounds rather as a checkbashisms bug
(see #772336 for detailed comments).
Thanks,
Jerome
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUhDE3AAoJEIC/w4IMSybjnjMH/R9w4Q5KWb8lblCRIDFclkhG
zf/D8nVIS/nMnDGzUjSWX483OstZSiI0IdjgAEduyWGz9ri/c0qzYkwGDfLZANN0
OKbfFBsgOHHt3ukFmBIVMknxwSe/jNQifYgiMORj/qcgw3eHkRx3emdLWkfhjdPS
Kv4ZRKba+srZPhrPcGUddHBgpl7HT5TYPKokzqxTJvIPXvDjd+D/8rP5Ff8YWd3m
CzQtAsGWimBGdQ30Ap6PtPOn4ZomgfOsqRe/SpTFKPG1Xfv3rDVIVA2C0lwelnvT
85jl4X7ZY9T39GNde4ngIE6D0NeS2cggzkgdFFJCzfcLVpwSqpX4+r1AZ3bosKI=
=hIpy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
