Hi Gianfranco, Is there any way in which I could get access to an armel porter box to try and work out what’s causing the failure?
Thanks, James > On 24 Jan 2016, at 20:26, James Clarke <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am aware s390x is failing. I have been trying to port it, and it no longer > segfaults (thanks to the pexport-endian.diff patch from upstream), but one > part of the build step (the compiler bootstrapping itself) exits with code 1, > without printing anything. That’s on my list of things to talk to upstream > about. > > x32 fails because there’s some hand-written assembly that isn’t aware of x32 > (it assumes i386 and amd64 are the only two cases). > > Interestingly armel has failed a test case for floating-point (funnily enough > I had just that test failed when I was testing ppc64el and it turned out to > be a bug in qemu!), so I’ll need to look into that. Previous uploads weren’t > running the tests as part of the build, so I don’t know if this is a > regression or not. armhf has built successfully though... > > I’m currently a student, so one package is more than enough, although > certainly one day I would consider applying to be a Debian Maintainer. Having > said that, for a package in debian-science, there’s hardly any inconvenience > on my part. > > Regards, > James > >> On 24 Jan 2016, at 20:10, Gianfranco Costamagna >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Sure, thanks for the kind words for the former maintainers :) >> >> Btw s390x and x32 just failed to build, you might want to poke upstream >> about a porting, and ping me about testing patches on porter boxes :) >> >> If you want ti maintain some other packages you might even consider applying >> for Debian Contributor or Debian Maintainer, you are doing a good job here, >> you might even have direct upload privileges one day for this package :) >> >> Cheers, >> >> G. >> -------------------------------------------- >> Dom 24/1/16, James Clarke <[email protected]> ha scritto: >> >> Oggetto: Re: polyml 5.5.2-4 >> A: "Gianfranco Costamagna" <[email protected]> >> Cc: "Debian Science Team" >> <[email protected]>, "Lionel Elie Mamane" >> <[email protected]>, "Achim D. Brucker" <[email protected]> >> Data: Domenica 24 gennaio 2016, 20:47 >> >> Oh right, I wasn’t >> aware such a thing was the done thing; I was just using >> xindy (just so happened to see that someone took over >> maintenance of it on debian-devel) as a reference. Of course >> it goes without saying that I’m grateful for all the work >> Lionel and Achim have done on it; I hope nobody thinks >> otherwise. Without them there would be no Poly/ML package on >> Debian and its derivatives. >> >> Thanks for continuing to sponsor me! >> >> Regards, >> James >> >>> >> On 24 Jan 2016, at 19:41, Gianfranco Costamagna >> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I uploaded >> it a few seconds ago, hopefully it will appear before the >> next dinstall >>> (due in 12 minutes), and >> then start building everywhere. >>> >>> BTW nitpick, usually on changelog when a >> person takes over a package maintenance >>> >> is used to say somthing like >>> "take >> over the package maintenance >>> - thanks >> Lionel, and Achim for your work!" >>> >> >>> and then upload :) >>> >>> anyway, thanks to >> you both for your work, and James, keep up the nice work! >>> (as you did in the last three uploads) >>> >>> cheers, >>> >>> Gianfranco >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Il Domenica 24 >> Gennaio 2016 20:38, James Clarke <[email protected]> >> ha scritto: >>> Hi Gianfranco (cc’d >> Lionel and Achim as this upload officially makes me >> uploader), >>> Many thanks; I’ll push the >> changes to debian-science/polyml.git. >>> >> >>> Regards, >>> James >>> >>> >>>> On 24 Jan 2016, at 19:36, Gianfranco >> Costamagna <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> >> Signed&Uploading in a few minutes! >>>> >>>> thanks for >> your contribution to Debian! >>>> >>>> cheers, >>>> >>>> Gianfranco >>>> >> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Il Domenica 24 Gennaio 2016 14:54, >> James Clarke <[email protected]> >> ha scritto: >>>> Hi Gianfranco, >>>> >>>>> 1) you >> took over the package maintenance, can I see a post where >> the current uploaders acked the change? >>>> >>>> Please see >> the entirety of this thread in debian-science: >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2016/01/msg00035.html >>>> >>>>> 2) a >> patch against testsuite not mentioned in changelog >>>>> 3) patches against mips* not >> mentioned in changelog. >>>>> >>>>> basically I would change changelog >> mentioning the patch name, e.g. >>>>> >> new patches: >>>>> foo.diff: add >> support for foo architecture >>>>> >> >>>>> and so on. >>>>> the patches should be good :) >>>> >>>> I have >> amended the changelog and re-uploaded to mentors; how is it >> now? >>>> >>>> >> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >> James >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
